THE ARTICLE BELOW WAS WRITTEN BY PAUL ZENNON (A MAGICIAN BY THE WAY) WHO'S NO DOUBT WRITTEN THIS FOR THE DAILY MAIL FOR PUBLICITY FOR HIS BOOK. HOWEVER HE HAS NEGLECTED TO DO HIS RESEARCH AND ASSUMES EVERYONE IS TARRED BY THE SAME BRUSH AS HIM. JUST BECAUSE HE USES TRICKERY TO DECEIVE, HE NEEDS TO REALISE NOT ALL DO. IF HE WAS A PSYCHIC IN HIS 20'S HE COULD NOT HAVE BEEN A GOOD ONE SO RESORTED TO CHEATING, SHAME ON HIM
What a load of crystal balls! As Diana's former psychic is accused of cheating on stage, a TV illusionist exposes how trickery can fool any audience
Nervously, an elderly woman in the stalls raises her hand. ‘My late husband was called David.’
Bingo! The psychic has found her target.
‘I think your David is with us now,’ she announces, to gasps of astonishment. ‘Did your David suffer from pain in his back?’ In the stalls, the woman nods incredulously. ‘Did he pass recently?’ The woman nods again.
‘Well, he wants you know that all the pain has gone now, that he loves you very much and that thing you’ve been worrying about... you’re not to worry about it any more.’
As applause fills the auditorium, the elderly woman dabs away the tears.
But was Ms Morgan really addressing the spirit of dear, departed David?
A member of the audience claims otherwise, saying that she could hear a man’s voice relaying information, presumably via a microphone and hidden earpiece — such as ‘David, pain in back, passed quickly’ — to the psychic superstar on stage who, 10 seconds later, claimed to be talking to the spirit of David.
The voice only stopped when it was heard by a theatre usher, who closed an internal window.
So was Ms Morgan getting a little help from the real world rather than the spirit world? While she insists absolutely not — *although it is still illegal in this country to claim to be a medium — having studied stage psychics for years and been one myself in my 20s, I am sceptical.
When people come to see a magician, they know they are being deceived, be it by sleight of hand, misdirection or technical ingenuity. But they’re happy to be deceived because it’s skilful, entertaining and fun: people are happy to suspend their disbelief. Unlike at shows such as Sally Morgan’s, when the audience genuinely believe they are communing with the dead.
‘Stage psychics’ and mediums have propagated this myth for years, using various techniques to overcome our natural disbelief in their so-called powers.
People tend to forget that psychic shows are very big business. In some theatres you can get audiences of 2,000 or more which, at £20 to £50 a ticket, generates a huge amount of cash to be shared.
This money, the innocent audience believes, will be shared between the theatre and the single person they have come to see — the stage psychic who, of course, is there ‘to help’ the bereaved and the grieving.
These days, most psychic performers have given up using ‘plants’ — people they pay to pretend to be regular members of the audience — because it’s too easy to be found out.
But what if the plants aren’t actually seen in the show? What if they just mingle with the audience, listening into conversation, only to sneak off and relay the information backstage before the show begins?
Gullibly, we believe the performance starts when the curtain goes up; in fact, it probably got under way the moment you walked through the theatre door and started to have a conversation with your friend, despite that chap who was standing so close.
Pre-show work, it’s called, and television audiences for these increasingly popular shows are particularly vulnerable to it. Was that really an audience research questionnaire you filled in before the show started, or have you just made the performer’s job a whole lot easier?
The same goes for anyone who’s paid by credit card at the theatre or whose name appears on its mailing list. Armed with that sort of information, a researcher could be examining your Facebook wall in seconds.
But there’s nothing new about pre-show work. In the heyday of the travelling show in America in the 19th century, members of the psychic’s team would arrive in town the day before the rest of the show.
Keeping a practised low profile, they’d wander through the cemeteries, looking for newly-dug graves, seeing which one had fresh flowers on.
Combine that with an afternoon spent at the town library looking at obituaries in the local paper and huge amounts of information could be dug up to dazzle the audience with when it was duly unveiled the next day.
Communications technology has been used by psychics for around a century.
Hidden microphones (now in mobile phones, pens or badges), earpieces and human helpers are all still employed by psychic performers, but the biggest research resource these days is, of course, the internet.
A few months ago I was offered a piece of software that if you fed it a name and a town — which psychics could have access to through ticket sales — would give you an address, and the names of family members (including the recently deceased) and neighbours.
Courtesy of Google Earth and Street View, it could even give you full details of their house, right down to the colour of the front door and the make and model of their car.
It took about 30 seconds and cost around £5,000 a year, small change given the amount of money these performers rake in.
Cold-reading starts with examining your audience closely as your performance begins: their clothes, hands, hair. It’s amazing what a skilled cold-reader can learn just by looking at someone, such as their age, their marital status and their social class.
Then you take an even closer look. Who’s nudging their neighbour? Who’s leaning forward? Whose jaw has just dropped at the mention of a name. You’ve found a target.
Then the fishing starts.
‘Have you lost someone you loved? Have they passed over to the other side?’ Now, that’s a silly question at a psychic show. The only reason people go to such shows is because someone they loved has died and they’re hoping for a message from them.
But because the psychic has got the first question right, the audience member starts to believe. Emotionally, they desperately want to believe, so when the psychic runs through ‘Was it your mother, father, brother, husband?’ the target hears only the right answer: everything else is mentally edited out.
‘It was my brother Edward,’ they mumble, and from here, the skilled psychic performer is away.
It can be vague — ‘You find it easy to make friends but you haven’t many close friends. Am I right?’ But it can also seem very specific, with questions designed to further win an audience’s trust. ‘Have you got a scar on your left knee?’
You’ll be amazed how often the answer is yes, and if it isn’t, they simply move swiftly on. The audience barely notices and the psychic goes on with the show — raking in pots of cash in the process.
And it is the lucrative nature of this deceit which annoys professional magicians like me. Stage psychics use very similar techniques to us — their audiences are being deceived by the same means — but those audiences don’t realise it and are parting with their money only because they’re bereaved, lonely and at their lowest ebb.
So if, Heaven forbid, performers like Ms Morgan aren’t actually talking to the dead... then I think the public has a right to know.
- Paul Zenon is a magician, paranormal sceptic and author of books about magic and swindles, including Street Magic and 100 Ways To Win A Tenner.
* IT IS NOT ILLEGAL TO CALL YOURSELF A MEDIUM IN THE UK
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feed back and comments are always welcome and I look forward to your views and opinions, But please make them in English.
Sorry but Spam is automatically deleted as will unappropriated back links